The Subspecies of the Mexican Red-bellied

Squirrel, Sciurus aureogaster

BY

KEITH R. KELSON

University of Kansas Publications

Museum of Natural History

Volume 5, No. 17, pp. 243-250

April 10, 1952

University of Kansas

LAWRENCE

1952

University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History



Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, A. Byron Leonard,

Edward H. Taylor, Robert W. Wilson



Volume 5, No. 17, pp. 243-250

April 10, 1952




University of Kansas

Lawrence, Kansas

PRINTED BY

FERD VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER

TOPEKA, KANSAS

1952



24-2174

[Pg 245]

The Subspecies of the Mexican Red-bellied

Squirrel, Sciurus aureogaster

BY

KEITH R. KELSON

In his excellent taxonomic treatment of the tree squirrels of Mexico
and Central America, Nelson (Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 1:15-110,
2 pls., May 9, 1899) recognized three subspecies of red-bellied
squirrels, Sciurus aureogaster aureogaster F. Cuvier, Sciurus aureogaster
hypopyrrhus Wagler, and Sciurus aureogaster frumentor Nelson.
In his lists of specimens examined, Nelson (op. cit.:42 and 44)
assigned certain specimens from "mountains near Santo Domingo"
and Guichicovi in Chiapas, and Catemaco in Veracruz, to S. a.
aureogaster, and other specimens from the same localities to S. a.
hypopyrrhus. I originally attempted to study (identify to subspecies)
the series of animals from only three places, but it became
evident that a more extensive study was indicated.

The locality whence the holotype of Sciurus aureogaster aureogaster
was obtained is unknown. Because certain specimens from
Altamira, Tamaulipas, closely resemble Cuvier's figure of the type,
Nelson (op. cit.:41) subsequently designated Altamira as the type
locality. Miniatitlan, Veracruz, was designated by Nelson as the
type locality of S. a. hypopyrrhus because Wagler's description of
the type of that subspecies fitted so well certain of Nelson's specimens
from that place.

Sciurus a. hypopyrrhus was said by Nelson (op. cit.:43 and 44) to
differ from S. a. aureogaster in darker color, thinner pelage, much
stiffer and more shining dorsal hairs, slenderer tail with black
predominating, larger and proportionately narrower skull with larger
auditory bullae, each bulla being "slightly constricted just in front
of middle." Sciurus aureogaster varies greatly in intensity of
color and in color-pattern. Fully 30 per cent of the specimens
examined are in some degree melanistic and approximately 20 per cent
of them are completely so. Others are more or less brown; the brown
dulls the usually rufous parts. In many specimens this brown is well
distributed even in the otherwise grizzled areas; in some specimens
it is evenly distributed and in others it is in patches. Indeed,
scarcely any two "normally" colored specimens are alike. Typically,
the intense rufous color characteristic of the underparts in both
[Pg 246]
S. a. aureogaster and S. a. hypopyrrhus is also present on the
costal region and shoulders. Even this distribution of color is highly
variable; some specimens (for example No. 23948 KU, from 3 km. E San
Andres Tuxtla, Veracruz) show no rufous dorsally and others (for
example No. 19307 KU, from 20 km. W Piedras Negras, Veracruz) have the
rufous extending over the legs, sides, and almost all of the dorsum
from the shoulders to the rump except (in some) for an interrupted
median strip of grizzled gray. It is true that specimens from
Miniatitlan are darker than those from Altamira, but this seems not to
be significant taxonomically, because examination of series from other
localities provides no evidence of geographic variation in color
except, possibly, in the frequency of melanism. A series of 13
specimens (Univ. Kansas) from 7 and 8 km. WNW Potrero, Veracruz, for
example, is quite as dark as topotypes of S. a. hypopyrrhus from
Miniatitlan, although the localities of capture are approximately in
the center of the geographic range of S. a. aureogaster. In short,
there seems to be no way to distinguish S. a. hypopyrrhus from S.
a. aureogaster on the basis of color. An unusual amount of variation
exists, but it seems to occur at random. Fixing type localities of the
two subspecies at the places of origin of certain specimens which in
color fit the original descriptions is meaningless because selected
specimens or series from almost any place in the geographic range of
the species would qualify as approximate color-duplicates of the
types.

My findings agree with those of Nelson in that skulls from Miniatitlan
average longer and narrower than those from Altamira, but
this seems not to be significant taxonomically because the series
from Altamira is, to judge from the material I have seen, somewhat
shorter and broader cranially than is "average" for the alleged subspecies
S. a. aureogaster. For example, series from Metlaltoyuca in
Puebla, 3 km. E Axtla in San Luis Potosí, 8 km. NW Potrero and
20 km. NW Piedras Negras in Veracruz, although obtained from
localities well within the geographic range of S. a. aureogaster (as
outlined by Nelson), all more closely resemble the "topotypes" of
S. a. hypopyrrhus in cranial measurements than they do "topotypes"
of S. a. aureogaster. Conversely, specimens from that part of the
range of S. a. hypopyrrhus most remote from the range of S. a.
aureogaster (Montecristo, La Venta, and Teapa, all in Tabasco)
more closely approximate the Altamiran series in cranial size and
proportions than they do the Miniatitlan material. Therefore, my
data contradict the statement of Nelson (loc. cit.) that the skulls of
S. a. hypopyrrhus are larger but proportionately narrower than those
[Pg 247]
of S. a. aureogaster. The constriction of the auditory bullae alluded
to by Nelson as being present in S. a. hypopyrrhus is also present in
S. a. aureogaster, occurring in both subspecies in varying degrees
without correlation with geographic distribution.

Actually, the only concrete evidence of geographic variation that
I can detect in these animals is a slight increase southwardly in the
frequency and degree of melanism, a kind of variation that is unworthy
of taxonomic recognition in this species. It seems best, then,
to regard the name Sciurus aureogaster hypopyrrhus Wagler as a
synonym of Sciurus aureogaster aureogaster F. Cuvier.

Nelson (op. cit.:45) stated that S. a. frumentor "Differs strikingly
from typical aureogaster in having well-marked nuchal and rump
patches of yellowish brown or rufous brown; the underparts gray
or gray washed with rufous; tail heavier and more bushy; pelage
softer.... Skull indistinguishable from that of typical aureogaster."
I have examined 22 specimens from Jico, 7 from Las Vigas
(the type locality), and one from 3 km. E Las Vigas, all in Veracruz.
These include the type and paratypes of S. a. frumentor. Part
(probably 7 specimens) of the series from Jico was referred by
Nelson (op. cit.:46) to S. a. frumentor and he thought, or knew,
these specimens to have been taken above Jico. The remaining
specimens labelled as from Jico were referred to S. a. aureogaster.
I am unable to find fault with the characterization of S. a. frumentor
insofar as color or skull are concerned. I cannot verify to my own
satisfaction the presence of "heavier" and bushier tail and softer
pelage. The characters considered to be diagnostic of S. a. frumentor
are distributed in an interesting geographic pattern the
genetic import of which is not wholly clear. One specimen (No.
23945 KU) of the two available from 3 km. SW San Marcos, Veracruz,
a locality on the coast approximately 50 miles north of Las
Vigas, is indistinguishable from topotypes of S. a. frumentor except
for slightly lighter-colored grizzled parts. The second specimen
(No. 23946 KU) from the same locality, although a subadult in
worn pelage, shows the color and striking dorsal pattern of S. a.
frumentor and the ventral color of S. a. aureogaster. The dorsal
pattern of S. a. frumentor is found also in the three specimens from
San Carlos and Plan del Río, Veracruz (Nos. 11082, 11083 and
8278), Chicago Nat. Hist. Mus., respectively. (The two specimens
from San Carlos were referred to S. a. frumentor by Elliot, Field
Columb. Mus., Zool. Ser., vol. 8, Publ. no. 115:128, February 9,
1907.) Nevertheless, although the essential morphological characters
of S. a. frumentor occur sporadically in other populations, the
[Pg 248]
animals from the higher elevations above Jico and Las Vigas are
notably homogeneous, differ collectively from surrounding populations,
and occupy a logical geographic range. Therefore S. a. frumentor
is retained as a tenable subspecies, and the animals from the
vicinity of San Marcos, and from San Carlos and Plan del Río are
referred to S. a. aureogaster. Incidentally, Nelson (op. cit.:45) remarks
that he saw no melanistic specimens of S. a. frumentor. This
is not strange because melanistic specimens could not be identified
anyway.

Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of Sciurus aureogaster.

1. Sciurus aureogaster aureogaster.       2. Sciurus aureogaster frumentor.

[Pg 249]
The names, absolute synonyms, and geographic ranges of the two
subspecies of Sciurus aureogaster here recognized are as follows:

This report is based on the examination of 256 specimens representing
the entire known geographic range of the species. I am indebted to H.
E. Anthony, Remington Kellogg, C. C. Sanborn, and Stanley P. Young for
the privilege of examining specimens in their charge. The study here
reported upon was aided by a contract between the Office of Naval
Research, department of the Navy, and
[Pg 250]
the University of Kansas (NR 161-791). The specimens in the University
of Kansas Museum of Natural History were obtained by field work
supported by the Kansas University Endowment Association.

Transmitted December 6, 1951.

24-2174