Systematic Status of a South American Frog,

Allophryne ruthveni Gaige

Acknowledgments.—We are grateful to Dr. Ernest E. Williams, Museum of
Comparative Zoology (MCZ) and Dr. Richard G. Zweifel, American Museum
of Natural History (AMNH) for the loan of specimens. We are further indebted
to Dr. Zweifel for permission to clear and stain one specimen. Dr.
William E. Duellman and Linda Trueb offered many constructive criticisms.
Miss Trueb executed the drawings of the skull and finger bones. Mr. Martin
Wiley provided x-ray photographs of Allophryne.

Six of the seven known specimens were available for study. Measurements
were taken in the manner described by Duellman (1956). One specimen was
cleared and stained, using the technique of Davis and Gore (1936), in order
to study the skeleton. X-ray photographs were made of another specimen for
comparison.

Specimens examined.—Six, as follows: BRITISH GUIANA, Dist. Demarara:
Marudi Creek, AMNH 44749; Dist. Equibo: Tumatumari, MCZ 11790 (paratype);
Dist. Rupununi (Berbice): Wai Wai Country, N of Acarahy Mountains,
west of New River (2°N, 58°W), KU 69890. Also, 3 specimens from "probably
British Guiana," AMNH 70108-10 (70110 cleared and stained).

Allophryne Gaige, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan, 176:1, Oct.
14, 1926. Crawford, Annals Carnegie Mus., 21(1):29, 32, Nov. 14,
1931. Noble, The biology of the amphibia. McGraw-Hill, p. 510, 1931.
Ruthven, Herpetologica, 1:3, July 11, 1936. Gallardo, Papéis Avulsos,
17:79, Jan. 1, 1965.

Type species.—Allophryne ruthveni Gaige.

Diagnosis and definition.—A genus of diminutive frogs; vomers, maxillae,
and premaxillae edentate; skin of head strongly anchored to connective tissue
on cranium; prepollical spine absent in males; disk of third finger larger than
tympanum, smaller than eye; no humeral hook in either sex; ilia extending
anteriorly beyond sacral expansions; adults attaining snout-vent length of
31 mm.; male having darkened external subgular vocal sac; skin of dorsum
pustulate.

Allophryne ruthveni Gaige, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan,
176:1-3, pl. I, Oct. 14, 1926. Crawford, Annals Carnegie Mus., 21(1):32,
Nov. 14, 1931. Ruthven, Herpetologica, 1:3, July 11, 1936. Barbour
and Loveridge, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 96(2):64, Feb., 1946. Peters,
Occas. Papers Mus. Zool., Univ. Michigan, 539:10, Sept. 19, 1952.

Holotype.—University of Michigan Museum of Zoology 63419, adult female,
from Tukeit Hill, below Kaiteur Falls, Equibo District, British Guiana; obtained
in May, 1924, by E. N. Clarke.

Diagnosis.—Fingers free; toes two-thirds webbed; no supernumerary tubercles
on soles or palms; no tarsal fold; elongate anal sheath, anal opening on
lower surface of thighs; head broad, interorbital space 2.5 times width of upper
eyelid; snout subacuminate in dorsal profile, strongly sloping in lateral profile;
tympanum visible in males, concealed in females; venter areolate.

External Morphology.—(Fig. 1) Additional features not mentioned in diagnoses:
Head wider than long, about as wide as body; supratympanic fold present;
canthus rostralis rounded, loreal region slightly concave, nearly vertical;
nostril at tip of snout; pupil horizontal; no teeth on maxillary, premaxillary, or
vomer; tongue small, round, thick, not notched behind, free posteriorly for
one-sixth of length; choanae large, only partly visible from directly below;
males having darkened subgular vocal sac; vocal slits present in male.

Axillary membrane lacking or but slightly developed; no tubercles or ridge
under forearm; two palmar tubercles; subarticular tubercles small, simple,
round, flattened; tips of fingers slightly expanded, T-shaped, with prominent
transverse groove; first finger shorter than second (stated as longer than second
in diagnosis by Gaige, 1926:2); folds extending laterally from anus for a
short distance, then downward to venter of thighs; no appendage on heel, no
inner or outer tarsal folds or tubercles; inner metatarsal tubercle oval, about
twice as long as wide; outer metatarsal tubercle nearly absent; no supernumerary
tubercle on sole; subarticular tubercles on foot small, round, simple, and diffuse;
toes T-shaped, slightly wider than digit; toes about two-thirds webbed
(Fig. 1d).

Skin of venter coarsely areolate; skin of flanks, throat, chest, undersurfaces
of arms, tibia, tarsi, dorsal surfaces of thighs, tarsi, hands, and feet smooth;
skin of dorsal surfaces of tibia, forearm, back, and top and sides of head having
large horny pustules (sharply spinous in male).

Color.—Dorsum gray with irregular network of black lines and elongate
blotches; flanks and labial region black with large white ocelli; dorsal surfaces
of limbs gray, marked as follows: two large, elongate white spots on each
thigh, concealed white spot on base of upper arm, black-edged gray transverse
bars on forearms and shanks, white spot on each knee and elbow; ventral surfaces
pale gray; black-edged white spot on ventral surface of thigh on each
side of anal opening; chin and throat dark gray with white spots; vocal sac
in male black (Fig. 1a and c).

Gaige (1926) briefly described the color, which conforms to the above in
all particulars. The paratype (MCZ 11790) has lost the gray color after 40
years in preservation; now (1966) the ground-color is cream-brown, and the
dorsal spotting, noted by Gaige as being black, is now brown.

The spots on the feet, tarsi, knees, thighs, flanks and upper arm are white
in preservative, but in life possibly were red or yellow. These colors usually
fade to white in preservative. Red or yellow spots are common aposematic
colors in frogs.

Variation.—Eight measurements were taken on each specimen and four
ratios were computed; these are summarized in Table 1. Gaige's illustration
of the holotype shows that it has a greatly reduced pattern, whereas the paratype
and three of the other five known specimens have relatively large and
numerous spots. The male (KU 69890) and one female (AMNH 70108) have
a reduced pattern intermediate between that of the holotype and the four other
specimens.

The dorsal spinules are most pronounced and extensive on the male (Fig.
1) and less so in all other specimens examined. The illustration of the holotype
suggests that it has equally prominent, but fewer, spinules (Gaige, 1926).

The holotype, a gravid female, is the largest known specimen (31 mm.,
snout-vent length). Another gravid female (AMNH 70108) has a snout-vent
length of 26.2 mm.

Distribution.—All known specimens have been found in the foothills of the
northeastern face of the Guiana Massif in British Guiana.

The skull of Allophryne (Fig. 3) is distinctive among anurans; it does not
closely resemble the skulls of either hylids or centrolenids, both of which have
generally more delicate (except for casque-headed hylids, such as Corythomantis,
Diaglena, Osteocephalus, Triprion) and generalized skulls. Allophryne
on the other hand has a strongly ossified central region (cranial roofing
bones and sphenethmoid complex) and a weak peripheral zone. The peripheral
elements are reduced (maxilla, pterygoid, and squamosal) or absent (quadratojugal),
whereas the frontoparietals, nasals, sphenethmoid, proötics, and exoccipitals
form a compact central zone. An elongate frontoparietal fontanelle is
present.

Fig. 3. Dorsal view of skull of Allophryne (AMNH 70110). × 12.

Dorsally (Fig. 3), the premaxillae are not visible. The proportionally
gigantic septomaxillae are visible anterior to the nasals. The moderate-sized
nasals are separated medially and in broad contact with the ethmoid posteriorly.
The palatine process of the nasal does not meet the frontal process of the
maxilla. A large frontoparietal fontanelle is evident between the frontoparietals.[Pg 501]
The tegmen tympani are much reduced and maintain only cartilaginous contact
with the posterior arms of the squamosals. The foramen magnum, occipital
condyles, and exoccipitals show no unusual features. The pars facialis
and frontal process of the maxilla are greatly reduced. The maxilla and
premaxilla are articulated. The high, narrow alary processes of the premaxillae
extend dorsally about two-thirds of the height of the snout. A cartilaginous
internasal septum is illustrated (Fig. 3), but sectioning is necessary to determine
the true nature and extent of this element.

Ventrally, the skull lacks palatines. The maxillae, premaxillae, and prevomers
are edentate. The parasphenoid is large with relatively short, stout
alary (lateral) processes. The sphenethmoid is extensive in ventral aspect and
forms the major supporting structure in the anterior part of the skull. The
pterygoid has a broad articulation with the maxilla, a tenuous contact with
the squamosal, but is not attached to the proötic. The anterior (zygomatic)
process of the squamosal is greatly reduced (only about one-third the length
of the posterior process).